President Donald Trump escalated his campaign to rebrand artificial intelligence on Thursday, declaring in a Truth Social post that the White House considers anyone who still uses the term "Artificial Intelligence" to be "THE ENEMY!"

"The White House considers anyone that uses the term, 'Artificial Intelligence,' as opposed to the highly accepted new and more accurate term, 'Super Intelligence,' THE ENEMY!" Trump wrote in the post, which was reported by Business Insider, Politico, Forbes and Axios within hours. For more context on this story, see our ongoing AI news.

The statement marks the sharpest rhetorical turn yet in a months-long effort to retire the phrase "artificial intelligence" from official American usage, a push that began with a United Nations speech in September and continued with a formal executive order signed at the White House late last month.

What Trump's Post Actually Says

The post does not specify any enforcement mechanism, but its framing — labeling users of a common technical term as adversaries of the administration — immediately drew attention from legal observers. Business Insider noted that the statement suggests the White House may punish companies or individuals who do not adopt its preferred vocabulary, which would raise "textbook First Amendment" concerns if enforced against private parties.

Trump has previously argued that the word "artificial" makes the technology sound "fake," a criticism he repeated while promoting the rebrand at a White House event with technology executives in September.

From UN Speech to Executive Order

The terminology campaign has moved quickly through three stages:

  • September 22: Trump announced during his address to the UN General Assembly that the United States was "officially" renaming artificial intelligence to "super intelligence," saying the phrase would be adopted across US government documents.
  • September 30: The president signed an executive order directing federal departments and agencies "to the maximum extent permitted by law" to use "Super Intelligence" and "SI" in place of "Artificial Intelligence" and "AI" in official correspondence, public communications and websites. At the same event, the largest US AI companies signed a voluntary safety accord that Trump described as "morally binding."
  • October 8: The Truth Social post declaring term-holdouts "THE ENEMY!"

The executive order binds only the federal government. As Business Insider reported, it does not apply to private-sector companies because the White House has no legal authority to compel them to change their own speech.

Silicon Valley's Split Response

The private sector's response has been a mix of compliance, hedging and quiet defiance.

Elon Musk said on X that SpaceX would rename its AI unit, SpaceXAI, to SpaceXSI — which would be the second rebrand for the organization originally known as xAI. SpaceX acquired xAI in February 2026 and rechristened the unit SpaceXAI in July. As of Thursday afternoon, the unit's X account still displayed the SpaceXAI name.

The rebrand produced awkward moments at the White House's technology panel the same day. According to Business Insider, Nvidia's chief executive corrected himself mid-sentence after saying "AI" instead of "SI" while standing near the president. OpenAI President Greg Brockman, by contrast, said his company "builds artificial intelligence" — using the very phrase now officially discouraged.

Other companies have deeper reasons to resist the change. Meta's Superintelligence Labs carried the "super intelligence" branding before Trump's push, but as a description of its research ambitions rather than a rejection of the standard term.

Why the Terminology Fight Matters

Critics say the dispute is more than semantics. Researchers and journalists have pointed out that "superintelligence" already has an established meaning in AI safety literature — referring to a hypothetical system that surpasses human capabilities across virtually all domains — and that collapsing it into a government-mandated synonym for today's commercial AI could blur a distinction that policymakers rely on.

Poynter examined the tension in a headline of its own: "Trump renamed AI 'super intelligence.' But that term already means something else." Lawmakers including Senators Bernie Sanders and Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have previously used "artificial superintelligence" in legislation that would pause frontier-scale training runs, underscoring how the term functions as a warning label in regulatory debates rather than a celebration.

There are also practical consequences. Standards bodies, academic publishers, state governments and international treaty texts all use "artificial intelligence." A federal government that says "SI" while courts, universities and treaty partners say "AI" creates translation friction in regulation, procurement and litigation — friction that will land on the desks of lawyers and compliance teams long before it reaches the public.

What Comes Next

For now, the "enemy" declaration appears to be rhetorical pressure rather than binding policy. But the administration has already tied terminology to tone at the top: federal agencies are expected to comply with the executive order, and companies courting federal contracts now face a White House that has signaled it notices who uses which word.

The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment on whether any enforcement mechanism is contemplated. Whether the rest of the English-speaking world follows Washington's vocabulary — or quietly continues saying "AI" — will become clear over the coming months as federal documents, agency websites and official correspondence are reworked.

For continuing coverage of AI policy, regulation and the industry's response, follow AI Buzz Wire's dedicated AI policy section.

---

Stay Ahead of AI

Get the latest AI news, analysis, and breakthroughs — all in one place.

Read more AI news →